Reviewer Management

Seamlessly manage reviewers, assign abstracts and full papers, and track progress effortlessly—ensuring your conference runs perfectly!

Reviewer Management is a key feature of a conference website, ensuring an efficient, fair, and transparent peer review process. It simplifies reviewer invitations, assigns submissions by topic or manually, and offers a dashboard for reviewers to score and provide feedback

Reviewer Management

ConfSubmithub's Conference Reviewer Management Software is the ultimate solution for academic and professional event organizers. We understand that managing the peer-review process is a critical and often manual task. Our platform is meticulously designed to eliminate the complexity, offering a streamlined and intuitive system that ensures a fair, efficient, and transparent review cycle for every submission.

Our system simplifies the entire workflow with a suite of powerful features, acting as a comprehensive Peer Review Platform for Conferences. Key functionalities include:

  • Intelligent Reviewer Matching: Our smart algorithm automatically suggests the most qualified reviewers for each submission based on their expertise, past reviews, and keywords. This ensures that every paper receives an expert evaluation.
  • Automated Reminders: Say goodbye to manual follow-ups. Our system sends out timely and customizable reminders to reviewers, ensuring they stay on track and meet their deadlines.
  • Centralized Dashboard: Gain full visibility into the review process. The easy-to-use dashboard provides a real-time overview of review statuses, allowing you to monitor progress and identify any bottlenecks instantly.

ConfSubmithub provides a robust and reliable Academic Peer-Review System that not only saves time and effort but also enhances the overall integrity of your conference. By adopting our solution, you can build trust within the academic community, attract higher-quality submissions, and deliver a professional and well-organized event. Streamline your review process and ensure every paper gets the attention it deserves.

Reviewer Invitation System
Reviewer Invitation System
  • Organizers can import reviewers from Excel or add them via a form, sending invitations to serve as reviewers
  • Reviewers can accept or decline, with notifications sent to the host in both cases
  • Flexible Assignment Options: Abstracts or papers can be assigned to reviewers by topic, randomly, or manually, allowing for alignment with reviewers’ expertise or preferences
Reviewer Dashboard
Reviewer Dashboard
  • A dedicated interface for reviewers to access assigned submissions, view abstracts, submit reviews, and track their progress (e.g., completed, in progress, not started).
  • Scoring options (e.g., 1-5 scale for each criterion). Space for reviewer comments and recommendations (e.g., “Accept,” “Revise,” “Reject”).
  • Progress tracking and reminders: monitor review progress and send reminders
  • Revision and Resubmission Option: Authors can revise and resubmit their abstracts if requested by reviewers, with a clear timeline for revisions.
Optimized Paper Workflow
  • Categorizing papers into folders or tags based on conference theme
  • Containing, filtering, sorting and searching paper
  • Collect additional documents required to upload along with the paper.
  • Allowing reviewers to download the full paper in PDF and DOC formats.
  • Easily generate insightful reports for better decision-making
Frequently Asked Questions
  • 1. What makes ConfSubmithub different from other conference management tools?

    Our focus is on creating a dedicated, user-friendly Conference Reviewer Management Software that simplifies the most complex part of your event. Unlike all-in-one platforms that can be cumbersome, our system is built for a seamless and intuitive peer-review process, ensuring a high-quality outcome with minimal administrative effort.

  • 2. How does the intelligent reviewer matching work?
  • 3. Can we customize the review criteria and forms?
  • 4. Is the platform secure and does it protect reviewer anonymity?
  • 5. Can we track the progress of reviews in real time?
  • 6. Is ConfSubmithub suitable for both small and large-scale conferences?
  • 7. Can we communicate with reviewers directly through the platform?